Miscellaneous: Pastel mark making and tonal study

I would like to get better at drawing with pastels… I did a brief internet search for tutorials on this technique and read some tips here and there. I saw too many photorealistic pastel drawings of pets and portraits, this is a style I don’t like. I’d like to do it differently…

To get some practice, I began with another mark-making exercise, this time with a reduced palette of colours: white, light grey, dark brown and black. I used grey, rough sketchbook paper. I experimented with tonal shadings and used cotton swabs to blend tones into each other, trying out different variations in 8cm sized squares. In the final one, I made a thumbnail tonal study of a white mug with a light source from the side. I wanted to focus on the pattern of light and shade, also reflected light. The thumbnail only permitted a rough sketch and I decided to do a larger study on the mug.

I drew the white mug with those 4 colours on the grey paper. I the initial version of the drawing, I had worked out the contrasts to the extreme. Although I saw the drawing as “finished”, I was so dissatisfied with the result, that on the next day, I decided to rework it.  I toned down the contrasts by lighting up the dark areas. Reworking the drawing seemed to be a good way to learn how the pastel material can be treated.

Despite having done a fixation on the first layer, I could take off pigment with soft tissue. Then I applied layers of lighter tones on the dark areas to lighten them up and smudged them softly to create a more even surface. I found this corresponded better to the smooth and shiny surfaces of the mug and the table. I also added some red strokes in the background and the mug’s cast shadow, because the all-grey tones impression was a bit dead. I think the drawing improved. The composition isn’t interesting, but after all, it’s just a study and I include it here to see where I get over time when I continue working with pastels.

Posted in 1: Mark-making and tone, Miscellaneous, Still life | Tagged | Comments closed

Still life sketches of made objects

I chose simple wooden musical instruments: Maracas (wooden stick attached to a coconut bowl which is filled with rough sand) and Cuban claves (cylindrical wooden sticks that are struck together to set the rhythm of a piece). I tried out three arrangements:

  • Landscape format, light from the side and viewpoint at 90° from the light source (top sketch)

The objects were placed almost by chance next to each other, without many overlapping areas.  I liked this composition for its simplicity and unpretentiousness.

  • Square format, light and viewpoint from above (left bottom sketch)

This was a chosen arrangement. I preferred having the three maracas together and the two claves to form small groups, rather than mixing them together. This felt more correct, maybe because it corresponds to the way these objects are used – a player typically has one or two Maracas in each hand and shuffles them rhythmically. Alternatively, he’d use the two clave sticks together, one in each hand. The light from above accounted for very short shades which helped to draw out the objects’ contours very clearly. I also found it easier to detect reflected lights on the lower parts of the objects, compared to the other two arrangements.

  • Tall format with light from the right front (right bottom sketch)

I arranged the objects behind each other, so that when I looked at them frontally, they would “pile up” in perspective to fit into a tall format. This was the most difficult arrangement in terms of perspective, because the objects’ handles were extremely shortened when they pointed away from the viewer.  There were many overlappings between the objects, and in the drawing the objects appear a bit “too close together” for my taste. Probably I should have placed them at more distance, this would also have helped to fill up the whole tall format, rather than squeezing the objects in the middle of the page. I found it also very difficult to draw a the dark coconut bellies of the maracas against their own dark cast shade – there were no easily identifiable contour lines, so the consequence would be to have undefined edges at these points. This would have worked better when colour helps to differentiate the objects. For a black and white pencil drawing, these were areas of not enough contrast.

I used a refillable graphite pen for the first composition, but found the grey tones not dark enough and therefore switched to 3B pencil for the remainder.

From the compositions, I preferred to have my objects completely depicted. I felt rather uncomfortable when the objects crossed the frame that I had set for the thumbnail, which happened twice. I found it not natural to cut off objects and therefore completed the drawing outside the initial frame. There was a suggestion in the course materials that cutting off objects would make for a more interesting composition, and maybe that’s true, but it’s not a natural thing for me to do. It’s different for items that are not central, like a table or other background. I have no problem cutting these off.

Despite many self-criticisms, I enjoyed the task and like all three compositional drawings.

Posted in 1: Mark-making and tone, Still life | Comments closed

Check and log: Reflected light

What are the difficulties in separating cast shadow from reflected light and shade?

I found it difficult to achieve an overall balanced pattern of shadow and lights. It was too easy to overdo the contrasts and create “holes” by making lines or areas too dark.

The reflected shadow and light follows the contours of the objects. How have you shown this in your drawing?

I have tried to follow the objects’ forms when drawing reflected light and shadow, for example with curved shadow shapes across the surface of the rounded clay pitcher.

Posted in 2: Observation in nature, Check and log, Reflected light | Comments closed

Research point: Giorgio Morandi

Giorgio Morandi (1890 – 1964), Italian painter and printmaker who specialized in still life, depicting very simple objects like pots and vases, for example ‘Natura morta’ (1956)  (source: Wikipedia).

Morandi seemed to have been fascinated by reflected light – he chose the most simple objects and followed the patterns of light and shade on their surfaces. I’m intrigued that Morandi continuously painted very similar objects – as if his idea of painting was that of doing research on patterns of reflected light. He extended this topic to other techniques, like the etching ‘Still life with five objects’ (1956)

But he also painted landscapes, which I find beautiful by their colours. Somehow they resemble his still lives, with their simple forms and their emphasis on tonal shadings.

Sources
Wikipedia, Giorgio Morandi http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giorgio_Morandi

Posted in 1: Mark-making and tone, Reflected light, Research points | Comments closed

Research point: Patrick Caulfield

Patrick Caulfield (1936 – 2005), a British painter and printmaker. He was a formally trained artist and also taught at the Chelsea School of Art. He’s often associated with pop art, although he himself did not like the label. He combined reduced line drawings in a single colour with photorealistic elements, for example in After Lunch (1975), Tate Gallery (source: Wikipedia).

He did many screenprints, where he employed flat colours and bold contour lines and simplified the shape of objects, omitting detail. Typically there are no differentiated patterns of tonal gradations.

The ‘Fruit and bowl’ (1979) and ‘Bottle and cups’ (1965) screenprints illustrate the emphasis on simple shapes and flat colours.

Some more screenprints which I found typical in the way how Caulfield created three-dimensional space just through the intersections of objects’ contours.

 

 

 

 

A drawing in the style of Caulfield

In order to make a drawing in the style of Patrick Caulfield, I reflected on what I found characteristic for Caulfield’s works. For me, this was

  • the almost complete omission of shadings
  • use of flat colour with sometimes two values – one light, one dark
  • black contour lines
  • focus on simple shapes, omission of detail

I considered a drawing in the style of the ‘After Lunch’ screenprint, combining a graphic line drawing with a photorealistic view out of the window. I arranged some objects on a table, and I could have used the view out of my two study windows as background. But I wasn’t sure how I could make the composition work, due to the size contrast between the relatively small objects on the table and the large windows, and I decided to try something else.

I placed three objects on a small cloth on a table, with a wall corner and an open door as a background. My idea was to focus on the simple forms of the objects and use only flat colours here, and to do the background as a line drawing. I started with a pencil drawing and then used colour crayons for the coloured areas. Finally I used felt pen for the contours. I felt that the drawing “fell apart” and therefore closed the contours to give the drawing a frame.

The drawing doesn’t focus on the topic of positive/negative space, so I guess I’m a bit off track with regard to the task in the study materials. Nevertheless I enjoyed the work and like the drawing. Maybe I’ll give it another try, paying more attention to positive/negative space.

 

Sources

Wikipedia, Patrick Caulfield http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_Caulfield

Posted in 1: Mark-making and tone, Reflected light, Research points | Comments closed

Shadows and reflected light and shade

The task was to draw two objects with reflective surfaces with charcoal on a large sheet, including the reflections of shadow and light on the surface, and using putty rubber to work out hightlights.

I selected two metal cooking pots for this drawing. I chose large ones, to have more surface on which to observe reflections, and also because I thought it would be better for filling the relatively large A2 sheet. I began with soft charcoal sticks to outline my objects and some of their detail. I did this with soft, short strokes – in my typical way of searching the forms, rather than drawing confident lines. When I wanted to sketch darker areas, I realized that the sticks were too thin to be put on the side, and I switched to a piece of pressed charcoal block.

I had many difficulties with the pressed charcoal. Sometimes it would make deep dark marks, at other times the marks were medium grey at most. The charcoal seems to be unevenly pressed, with some areas soft and others hard. Also I was working rather fast and almost never knew where the tip of the block was, so the lines that I drew only rarely matched the lines I saw and wanted to draw. I wasn’t very satisfied with what I’ve drawn. The coloured areas were too bold because of the rude marks and hatchings. Finally, bringing out highligths with putty rubber didn’t work, it rather smudged the charcoal and the tip wasn’t fine enough to make tiny highlights.

Overall, I found this task difficult. I might have done better if I had attempted only a detail of one pot, like a side with a section of the rim and a handle. Also, I should get more practice with charcoal. I liked this medium a lot in the free mark-making exercises, but here I found it very difficult to control. Especially, how would I make dark areas that are not dominated by my irregular mark making.

The drawing is rather raw, probably typical for charcoal. The reflective surfaces come out better when the drawing is looked at from a distance of three or four meters. Then the strokes from my marks disappear, and the actual pattern of dark and light areas comes to the fore.

Posted in 1: Mark-making and tone, Reflected light | Comments closed

Study of light reflected from one object to another

The task was to select two or three objects with a shiny surface, place a light source at one side and then draw the objects with the patterns of shadow and reflected light.

Page 1: B/W pencil drawing of two objects

It took me quite long to decide on the objects for this drawing. I tried some porcelain mugs, but they were so shiny and reflective and it was almost impossible for me to distinguish object reflections from reflected that I thought they’d be too difficult for this task. Finally I selected a clay pitcher and a clay plant pot, which both had shiny surfaces but these were not extremely reflexive.

The drawing began timidly as ever, with very light searching lines and minimal shadings. I wasn’t very satisfied and continued to work, trying to bring out more tones and achieve a broader array of tones from light to dark. I found it quite difficult to distinguish the main shadow pattern from tonality resulting from reflected light. But after some time there was a moment when I felt like I had stepped over an inner limit, from then on I could work more freely and applied more pressure on the pencil, resulting in darker tones and more contrasts.

I also became less concerned with getting details right and began to see larger patterns of shaded areas. I used a freestyle hatching technique which I find a bit too rough for the smooth surfaces, the hatching marks are sometimes too bold. But overall I feel I’ve made a step forward with this drawing, maybe beginning to overcome fears to spoil a drawing by making “false” marks.

Page 2: Coloured pastel drawing

I wanted to try out the same arrangement on mid-tone paper, to work out light and dark areas with black and white pastels. When looking through my drawing materials, I found pressed pastel blocks in brown tones, and decided to try whether I could draw the tonality of my clay objects in colour.

I’m very new to pastel and decided to give it a go without further preparation, in the hope of ‘learning by doing’. I found it rather difficult to depict the dark and light areas  – the different brown tones of my pastel sticks did not blend very well, and rather than having gradations of darkness, I had a mixture of various brown tones. I began to apply the pastels more densely, which improved the colouring, but I was not satisfied. Finally I smudged the colours to create a more even surface. This worked rather well. I stopped at that point.

My initial idea to use the paper’s colour as mid tone wasn’t at all achieved, instead it has been a learning experience in pastel colouring. Maybe I’ll give it another try using only black and white pastels on grey paper. Leaving out colours should help to focus on gradations of tonality and the shading pattern.

Posted in 1: Mark-making and tone, Reflected light | Comments closed

Check and log: Tone and form

How difficult did you find it to distinguish between light from the primary source and secondary reflected light

I’m not sure whether I have understood what is meant by this and if have seen it at all. Probably I should do some research on this topic, trying to find examples to be sure that I didn’t completely miss the point.

Addendum: After reading around secondary reflected light, as summarized in the post Drawing Skills: Secondary reflected light, I think I have recognized and drawn it in the tonal studies without too many difficulties.

How has awareness of light and shade affected your depiction of form?

I think it adds a lot more interest to the drawings. Becoming aware of the lighter and darker areas within a single colour, and integrating this into the drawing, supports the three-dimensionality illusion. In the tonal study of four objects, I tried to draw the hatching lines as if I were drawing on the objects’ surface, which seems to help giving them an appearance of volume.

 


Posted in 1: Mark-making and tone, Check and log, Tone and form | Comments closed

Drawing skills: Secondary reflected light

When asked in the Check and Log section for Part I, Project 3: Tone and Form, whether I found it difficult to distinguish between light from primary source and secondary reflected light, I realized that I wasn’s sure whether I had understood these concepts. A Google search brought up several sources, of which I have chosen two to summarize the idea:

Graphical illustration 1


source: http://www.learntoart.com/index.php/archives/drawing/how-to-shade/

 

Graphical illustration 2: Five areas

Specifically, five different light/shade areas can be distinguished on an object which is directly lit, i.e. with light going from a source straight to the object:

A: Highlight: The lightest point or area of the object
B: Halftone: Medium tone area
C: Core shadow: The darkest area of the object
D: Reflected light: This area is in the shadowy areas of the object, but it receives reflected light from another surface and therefore is lighter than the core shadow area
E: Cast shadow: The shadow which is cast from the object onto other surfaces, also a very dark area.


source: http://www.stanprokopenko.com/blog/2009/08/direct-light/

 

Posted in 1: Mark-making and tone, Miscellaneous, Tone and form | Comments closed

Research point: Odilon Redon

Odilon Redon (1840 – 1916) was a french painter, draughtsman and printmaker. Redon is well known as a symbolist painter, but he also made many naturalist paintings.

I do not like the strong mystical, surrealist aspects in many of his works, but I admire his sensitive and colourful paintings, when he chose more realist themes like portraits, flowers or landscapes. The website http://www.odilon-redon.org shows a huge collection of his works, from which I have chosen a seashell, a landscape, and four studies of geranium as examples.

 

 

I was very impressed how Redon brings out an exquisite, erotic quality of the seashell, and liked the garden scene for its beautiful colour variations in the blue sky, the grey wall and the green grass. Also, I very much liked the colourful simplicity and beauty of the geraniums.

 

Posted in 1: Mark-making and tone, Research points, Tone and form | Comments closed